I wanted an excuse to try out this Lisp-like embedded language Go library that was featured in Golang Weekly. Found one today when I was using Evans to test a gRPC endpoint and I wanted a way to automate it. Hacked up something in 30 minutes which takes a method name and a Lisp structure, converts it to JSON and uses Evans to send it as a gRPC message.
As the afternoon progressed, I added some facilities to send HTTP GET and POST methods with JSON request bodies, plus some facilities to set some global options.
Here’s a sample script:
// Set some global options (set_opt %grpc_host "www.example.com") (set_opt %grpc_port "8080") // Make a gRPC call. This will use evans to perform the call (call "my.fancy.Grpc.Method" (hash example: "body" message: "This will be serialised to JSON and sent as the body"))
Another script showing the HTTP methods
// The HTTP methods don't print out the response body by default, // so add a post-request hook to pretty print out the JSON. (defn hooks_after_response [resp] (print_json resp)) // Make a HTTP GET request to a JSON endpoint. // The JSON body will be converted to a hash so that the data can be useful (def user (rget "https://example.com/user/someone")) (def userName (hget user %name)) // Make a HTTP POST with a JSON body. (hpost "https://example.com/user/someone" (hash new_name: "another"))
It’s a total hack job but already it shows some promise. Evan’s REPL is nice but doesn’t make it easy to retest the same endpoint with the same data multiple times (there’s a lot of copying and pasting involved). For those purposes this is a little more satisfying to use.
Now that I had a chance to try Zygomys out, there are a few things I wish it did.
First, I wish it leaned more into the Lisp aspect of the language. The library supports infix notation for a few things, which I guess makes it easier for those who don’t particularly like Lisp, but I think it compromises some of the Lisp aspect of the languages.
For example, lists can be created using square brackets, but there’s no literal syntax for hashes. Not that there are any in Lisp either, but derivatives Clojure uses square brackets for arrays and curly brackets for hashes. Curly brackets are reserved for inline code blocks in Zygomys, so there’s no way to use them in a more functional context. I suppose something could be added — maybe square brackets with a prefix,
#["key" "value"] — but feels like a missed opportunity.
Another is that there’s no way to use dashes in identifiers. This may have just been an oversight, but I’m wondering if the infix notation support complicates things here as well. It would be nice to use them instead of the underscore. I don’t personally like the underscore. I know it’s just a matter of pressing shift, but when writing identifiers in lowercase anyway, using the dash feels a lot more natural.
Finally, on the Go API front, it would be nice to have a way to call functions defined in Zygomys in Go, much like those hook functions in the sample above. I think this is just a matter of documentation or adding a method to the API to do this. I see no reason why the engine itself can’t support this. So I’m happy for this to come down the line.
But in general this library shows promise, and it was fun to build this tool that uses it. Of course, we’ll see if I use this tool a second time when I need to test a gRPC endpoint, and I don’t just hack up yet another one that does essentially the same thing.